pp. 87 - 92 (6)
p. 92 The Daoist Answer 

The Hundred Schools of Ancient Philosophy

In China, as in other great river valley societies, the birth of civilization was accompanied by the emergence of an organized effort to comprehend the nature of the cosmos and the role of human beings within it. As civilization evolves, people cease to observe nature with awe and wonderment and begin to seek an explanation for the forces at work in the universe and their effects on human lives. This search, of course, marks the birth of religion and philosophy. In ancient China, speculation over such questions began in the very early stages of the rise of civilization and culminated at the end of the Zhou era in the "hundred schools" of ancient philosophy, a wide-ranging debate over the nature of human beings, society, and the universe.

The first hint of the nature of religious belief in ancient China comes from relics found in royal tombs in Neolithic times. By then, the Chinese had already developed a religious sense beyond the primitive belief in the existence of spirits in nature. As we have seen, the Shang had already begun to believe in the existence of one transcendent god, known as Shang Di, who presided over all the forces of nature. As time went on, the Chinese concept of religion began to evolve from the idea of a vaguely anthropomorphic god to a somewhat more impersonal symbol of universal order known as Heaven (Tian, or Tien), There was also much speculation among Chinese intellectuals about the nature of the cosmic order. One of the earliest ideas was that the universe was divided into two primary forces of good and evil, light and dark, male and female, called the yang and the yin, represented symbolically by the sun (yang) and the moon (yin). According to this theory, which is reminiscent of similar ideas developing in the Middle East and southern Europe, life was a dynamic process of interaction between the forces of yang and yin. Early Chinese could attempt only to understand the process and perhaps to have some minimal effect on its operation. They could not hope to reverse it. It is some­times asserted that this belief has contributed to the heavy element of fatalism in Chinese popular wisdom. The Chinese have traditionally believed that bad times will be followed by good times, and vice versa.

The belief that there was some mysterious "law of nature" that could be interpreted by human beings, a carry­over from the Shang period when sorcerers used oracle bones to seek communication with the gods, undoubtedly encouraged the practice of divination and other attempts to predict the future. Philosophers invented various ways to interpret the will of nature, while shamans, playing a role similar to the brahmins in India, were em­ployed at court to assist the emperor in his policy deliberations until at least the fifth century C.E. One of the most famous manuals used for this purpose was the Yi Jing (I Ching), known in English as the Book of Changes.

CONFUCIANISM

Such efforts to divine the mysterious purposes of Heaven notwithstanding, Chinese thinking about metaphysical reality also contained a strain of pragmatism, which is readily apparent in the ideas of the great philosopher Confucius. Confucius (the Latin form of his honorific title Kung Fuci, or Kung Fu-tzu, meaning Master Kung) was born in the state of Lu (in the modern province of Shandong) in 551 B.C.E. After reaching maturity, he apparently hoped to find employment as a political adviser in one of the principalities into which China was divided at that time, but he had little success in finding a patron. Nevertheless, he made an indelible mark on history as an independent (and somewhat disgruntled) political and social philosopher.

In conversations with his disciples contained in the Analects (a collection of his sayings preserved by his disciples), Confucius often adopted a detached and almost skeptical view of Heaven. "You are unable to serve man," he commented on one occasion, "how then can you hope to serve the spirits? While you do not know life, how can you know about death?" In many instances, he appeared to advise his followers to revere the deities and the ancestral spirits, but to keep them at a distance. Confucius believed it was useless to speculate too much about metaphysical questions. Better by far to assume that there was a rational order to the universe and then concentrate one's attention on ordering the affairs of this world.

Confucius’s interest in philosophy, then, was essentially political and ethical. The universe was constructed in such a way that if human beings could act harmoniously in accordance with its purposes, their own affairs would prosper. Much of his concern was with human behavior. The key to proper behavior was to behave in accordance with the Dao (Way). Confucius assumed that all human beings had their own Dao, depending on their individual role in life, and it was their duty to follow it. Even the ruler had his own Dao, and as we have seen, he ignored it at his peril. The idea of the Dao is reminiscent of the concept of dharma in ancient India and played a similar role in governing the affairs of society. Two elements in the Confucian interpretation of the Dao are particularly worthy of mention. The first is the concept of duty. It was the responsibility of all individuals to subordinate their own interests and aspirations to the broader need of the family and the community. This concept of duty is often expressed in the form of a "work ethic" similar to the so-called Puritan work ethic that allegedly characterized popular attitudes in Europe and North America during the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries. Confucius assumed that if each individual worked hard to fulfill his or her assigned destiny, the affairs of society as a whole would surely prosper as well. In this respect, it was important for the ruler to set a good example. If he followed his "kingly way," the beneficial effects would radiate throughout society.

A second key element in the Confucian interpretation of Dao is the idea of humanity, sometimes translated as "human heartedness." This concept involves a sense of compassion and empathy for others. It is similar in some ways to Christian concepts, but with a subtle twist. Where Christian teachings call on human beings to "behave toward others as you would have them behave to­ward you," the Confucian maxim is put in a different way: "Do not do unto others what you would not wish done to yourself." To many Chinese, this attitude symbolizes an element of tolerance in the Chinese character that has not always been practiced in other societies.

Confucius may have considered himself a failure because he never attained the position he wanted, but his ideas were undoubtedly appealing to many of his contemporaries, and in the generations after his death, his message spread widely throughout China. Confucius was an outspoken critic of his times, and like many a conservative in our own days, he lamented the disappearance of the Golden Age of the early Zhou.

In fact, however, Confucius was not just another disgruntled Chinese conservative mourning the passing of the good old days, but a revolutionary thinker, many of whose key ideas looked forward rather than backward. Perhaps his most striking political idea was that the government should not be limited solely to those of noble birth, but should be open to all men of superior quality. As one of his disciples reports in the Analects: "The Master said, by nature, men are nearly alike; by practice, they get to be wide apart." Confucius undoubtedly had himself in mind as one of those "superior" men, but the rapacity of the hereditary lords must have added strength to his convictions.

The concept of rule by merit was, of course, not an unfamiliar idea in the China of his day; the Rites of Zhou had clearly stated that the king himself deserved to rule be­cause of his talent and virtue, rather than as the result of noble birth. In practice, however, aristocratic privilege must have been a determining factor in opening the doors to political influence, and many of Confucius's contemporaries must have regarded his appeal for government by talent as both exciting and dangerous. Confucius did not explicitly question the right of the hereditary aristocracy to play an active and leading role in the political process, nor did his ideas have much effect in his lifetime. Still, they opened the door to a new concept of the art of statecraft that was later implemented in the form of a bureaucracy selected through a civil service examination.

     Confucius's ideas, passed on to later generations through the Analects as well as through other writings allegedly written by Confucius, had a strong impact on Chinese political thinkers of the late Zhou period at a time when the existing system was in disarray and open to serious question. But like most great thinkers, Confucius's ideas were sufficiently ambiguous to be interpreted in very contradictory ways. Some, like the philosopher Mencius (370-290 B.C.E.), stressed the humanistic side of Confucian ideas, arguing that human beings were by nature good and thus could be taught their civic responsibilities by example. He also stressed that the ruler had a duty to govern with compassion:

It was because Chieh and Chou lost the people that they lost the empire, and it was because they lost the hearts of the people that they lost the people. Here is the way to win the empire: win the people and you win the empire. Here is the way to win the people: win their hearts and you win the people. Here is the way to win their hearts: give them and share with them what they like, and do not do to them what they do not like. The people turn to a human ruler as water flows downward or beasts take to wilderness.

Here is a prescription for political behavior that could win wide support in our own day. Other thinkers, however, rejected Mencius's rosy view of human nature and argued for a different approach.

LEGALISM

One school of thought that became quite popular during the "hundred flowers" era in ancient China was the philosophy of Legalism. Taking issue with the view of Mencius and other disciples of Confucius that human nature was essentially good, the Legalists argued that human beings were by nature evil and would follow the correct path only if coerced by harsh laws and stiff punishments. They were referred to as the "School of Law," because they rejected the Confucian view that government by "superior men" could solve society's problems and argued instead for a system of impersonal laws.

The Legalists disagreed with the Confucian belief that the universe has a moral core. They therefore believed that only firm action by the state could bring about social order. Because human nature was essentially corrupt, officials could not be trusted to carry out their duties in a fair and evenhanded manner, and only a strong ruler could create an orderly society. All human actions should be subordinated to the effort to create a strong and pros­perous state subject to his will.

Both the Legalists and the author of the Indian treatise Arthasastra focused on the importance of the ruler within the political culture, but the latter tempered his utilitarian concern for the needs of the state by asserting that the ruler and his officials must display a true compassion for the needs of the people. The Legalists, however, countered that fear of harsh punishment, more than the promise of material reward, could best motivate the common people to serve the interests of the ruler. Legalism bears a superficial resemblance to modern Western democratic society in its emphasis on the need for impartial laws to govern human behavior, but it is closer to modern totalitarian doctrines in its conviction that the ultimate objective of the political process is not the welfare of the individual, but the needs of the state.

DAOISM

One of the most popular alternatives to Confucianism was the philosophy of Daoism (frequently spelled Taoism). According to Chinese tradition, the Daoist school was founded by a contemporary of Confucius popularly known as Lao Tzu (Lao Zi), or the Old Master. Many modern scholars are skeptical that Lao Tzu actually existed. Nevertheless, the ideas that are attributed to him attained popularity during the centuries before the founding of the Han dynasty and became a worthy rival to the Confucian school of philosophy.

Obtaining a clear understanding of the original concepts of Daoism is difficult because the primary document containing its principles, a short treatise known as the Dao DeJing (sometimes translated as The Way of the Too), is an enigmatic book whose correct interpretation has baffled scholars for centuries. The opening line, for example, explains less what the Dao is than what it is not: "The Tao [Way] that can be told of is not the eternal Tao. The name that can be named is not the eternal name."

Nevertheless, the basic concepts of Daoism, as they have been transmitted through the ages by followers of the doctrine, are not especially difficult to understand. Like Confucianism, Daoism does not anguish over the underlying meaning of the cosmos. Rather, it attempts to set forth proper forms of behavior for human beings here on earth.

In most other respects, however, Daoism presents a view of life and its ultimate meaning that is almost diametrically opposed to the one adopted by Confucius and his followers. Where Confucian doctrine asserts that it is the duty of human beings to work hard to improve life here on earth, Daoists contend that the true way to interpret the will of Heaven is not action, but inaction (wu wei). The best way to act in harmony with the universal order is to act spontaneously and let nature take its course.

Such a message could be very appealing to those who were uncomfortable with the somewhat rigid flavor of the Confucian work ethic and preferred a more individualistic approach. This image would eventually find graphic expression in the long tradition of Chinese landscape painting, which in its classical form would depict naturalistic scenes of mountains, water, and clouds and underscore the fragility and smallness of individual human be­ings.

Daoism achieved considerable popularity in the waning years of the Zhou dynasty and competed for favor with the various other doctrines that flourished at the time. It was especially popular among intellectuals, who may have found it appealing as an escapist antidote in a world characterized by growing disorder.

POPULAR BELIEFS

Daoism also played a second role as a somewhat loose framework for popular spiritualistic and animistic beliefs among the common people. Popular Daoism was less a philosophy than a religion; it comprised a variety of rituals and forms of behavior that were regarded as a means of achieving heavenly salvation or even a state of immortality on earth. Daoist sorcerers practiced various types of mind or body-training exercises in the hope of achieving power, sexual prowess, and long life. It was primarily in this form that Daoism would survive into a later age.

The philosophical forms of Confucianism and Daoism did not provide much meaning to the mass of the population, for whom philosophical debate over the ultimate meaning of life was not as important as the daily struggle for survival. For most Chinese, in ancient as well as in modern times, Heaven was not a vague impersonal law of nature, as it was for many Confucian and Daoist intellectuals, but a terrain peopled with innumerable gods and spirits of nature, both good and evil. As in Western societies, popular religion grew out of primitive beliefs in the existence of spirits in nature—in trees, mountains, and streams as well as the heavenly bodies. As human beings mastered the techniques of farming, they called on divine intervention to guarantee a good harvest. Other gods were responsible for the safety of fishermen, transportation workers, or prospective mothers.

Another aspect of popular religion was the belief that the spirits of deceased human beings lived in the atmosphere for a time before ascending to Heaven or descending to Hell. During that period of purgatory, surviving family members had to care for the spirits through proper ritual, or they would become evil spirits and haunt the survivors.

Thus, in ancient China, a multiplicity of doctrines and beliefs offered human beings a variety of interpretations of the nature of the universe. Confucianism satis­fied the need for a rational doctrine of nation building and social organization at a time when the existing political and social structure was beginning to disintegrate. Philosophical Daoism provided an alternative to Confucianism and a framework for a set of diverse animistic beliefs at the popular level. But neither could provide an ef­fective response to the deeper emotional needs that sometimes inspire the human spirit. Neither could effectively provide solace in a time of sorrow or the hope of a better life in the hereafter. Something else would be needed to fill the gap.

p. 92 
The Daoist Answer to Confucianism

The Dao De Jing (The Way of the Dao) is the great classic of philosophical Daoism (Taoism). Traditionally attributed to the legendary Chinese philosopher Lao Tzu (Old Master), it was probably written sometime during the era of Confucius. This opening passage illustrates two of the key ideas that characterize Daoist belief: it is impossible to define the nature of the universe, and "inaction" (not Confucian "action") is the key to ordering the affairs of human beings.

The Way of the Dao

The Tao that can be told of is not the eternal Tao;
The name that can be named is not the eternal name.
The Nameless is the origin of Heaven and Earth;
The Named is the mother of all things.

Therefore let there always be non-being, so we may see their subtlety.
And let there always be being, so we may see their
outcome.
The two are the same,
But after they are produced, they have different names.
They both may he called deep and profound.
Deeper and more profound,
The door of all subtleties
When the people of the world all know beauty as beauty,
There arises the recognition of ugliness.
When they all know the good as good,
There arises the recognition of evil. Therefore:
Being and non-being produce each other;
Difficult and easy complete each other;
Long and short contrast each other;
High and low distinguish each other;
Sound and voice harmonize each other;
Front and behind accompany each other.

Therefore the sage manages affairs without action
And spreads doctrines without words.
All things arise, and he does not turn away from them.
He produces them but does not take possession of them.
He acts but does not rely on his own ability.
He accomplishes his task but does not claim credit for it.
It is precisely because he does not claim credit that his accomplishment remains with him.